03 October, 2009

More Olympics Stupidity

So if its not Obama's fault that the Olympics didn't come to Chicago (and truly, I don't believe it is), then who's fault is it?

According to our illustrious Senator, Roland Burris (D-Blagojevich), its the fault of.... (drum roll, please) (you're not gonna believe this!) (of course, who else would he blame?)... George W. Bush.

Senator Rowland Burris of Illinois, the Senator who was appointed to fill President Barack Obama’s vacant Senate seat, blames George Bush for Chicago not getting the Olympics in 2016. Burris stated in an interview, shortly after the announcement, that the image of the U. S. has been so tarnished in the last 8 years that, even Barack Obama making an unprecedented pitch for the games could not overcome the hatred the world has for us as a result of George Bush.

What a moron. No, let me rephrase that. What a FUCKING moron.

We lost. We put up a good fight, but we lost. In large part because Rio played the IOC's game better than we did. There is nothing deeper to this than that. IT'S NO ONE'S FAULT.

*grumble*

Mark Kirk for US Senate!
The sooner we get this place holder out the better.

02 October, 2009

Obama and the Olympics

Okay, the Obama administration does get some flack around here, I'll admit that. But what the hell?!?

I understand that some people want to pin Chicago's loss on Obama. But c'mon, get real. IT'S THE FREAK'IN OLYMPICS. They're nice to have, would have been nicer still if they were in Chicago, but its hardly the end of the effing world that we didn't get them. Or that its some huge, decisive political defeat for the Obama administration. Chicago gave it their best shot, and so did the President. Doesn't mean we can't try again for the 2020 Olympics.

Geez, people. Give it a rest. There are more important things to get all bent out of shape about.

ADDENDUM:
IOC Vote totals are making it pretty obvious that Chicago had no chance. Rio was going to walk away with it from the very start. The only one who really had a fighting chance was Madrid, and that was primarily because Juan Antonio Samaranch had been an IOC President and promoter of the Olympic Games for decades. His appeal to the IOC was basically "Do this for me, because I have done well for you all my life." And it almost worked.

Yes, the fix was in. But this time, Chicago wasn't the one stuffing the ballot box.

Teen Titans #75 Review

 


Teen Titans #75
Written by Felicia D. Henderson; co-feature written by Sean McKeever; Art by Joe Bennett and Jack Jadson; co-feature art by Yildiray Cinar and Júlio Ferreira; Cover by Joe Bennett and Jack Jadson; variant cover by Andy Clarke

First off, let me state the obvious: Felicia Henderson did not hit a home run with this issue. More like a double that got stretched out to a triple via a throwing error. The issue got close to home and has a very good shot at getting there, but whether it ends up scoring will depend on what follows. I think she did slightly worse than your average Sean McKeever at-bat, but loads better than Judd Winick striking-out swinging at a bad pitch.

The issue was basically a set-up issue, introducing the team and its concept, its principal characters, and how they relate to one another. Remember, this is the first issue of the new writer’s run, and thus responsible for the task of setting up the new status quo. Under such a situation, its generally good to assume that new era’s will mean an above-average number of new readers entering the book. Thus, this issue was primarily devoted to brief introductions to the principal characters involved, their interactions to establish how they relate to one another, some hints at the conflicts they will be facing, and where everyone will possibly be going from here on out. Now obviously, those of us who have been following this series for a very long time have all gone through this before, more times than we care to recount (especially in recent history), so to many of us this sort of thing is old hat. In that way the introductory aspect of the issue does come off as a mixed blessing - a good intro for new readers unfamiliar with the characters and wanting some idea as to who they are, but a little annoying to those of us who are already familiar with them and would prefer it if they got on with the story already. I’m willing to let it pass for the moment, but acknowledge the frustration.

The writing was mostly acceptable. A tad melodramatic at times (the panel with Gar holding an unconscious Raven’s hand and declaring his love looks and reads like it came out of a 1960s romance comic book!), but the characters generally sounded right and their personalities shined through. The humor didn’t seem forced (unlike, sadly, Pat McCallum’s Titans issue), and in general the dialogue felt natural for the characters. There were some points where the scene shifts were a little jarring (the page where we go from Jamie berating Gar to Megan in Bombshell’s room felt a little strange), something that could have been easily rectified with a few well-placed narrator boxes saying “Meanwhile...” or “Elsewhere...” or “Later...”. Hopefully, as Ms. Henderson becomes more comfortable with writing in the medium, these sort of rough edges will disappear. But for right now, while they can be a little disconcerting to follow, I don’t think they are a major impediment to the story.

As everyone around here knows, I’m a big Gar Logan fan, so I for one was pleased to see him returning to the team and taking it over. I realize that this disappoints a number of Cassie fans, but lets be honest: Cassie hasn’t really been coming off well as a leader for quite some time, long before even Eddie’s death. People around here have been bitching about it for ages. So frankly, taking the time off from the responsibility might just be the best thing for her, time to get her confidence back together and rediscover who she is. Don’t worry, she’ll be back in the saddle some day. But for right now, she’s not really going anywhere, so its not like she’s being dropped into limbo. The only part about the hand-over I mildly disliked was that I thought Gar’s little speech to the group was a little annoying, though I will acknowledge it was mostly in character for him (still, I probably would have handled it differently).

As for Raven, I was glad to see her depicted as something other than the prickly bitch established by Judd Winick. So long as we keep that interpretation strictly confined to Titans, I’ll be happy (especially now that its looking like Titans is going to be sinking into relative obscurity fairly quickly). Interested to know what this empath villain is, and suspect it’s a set-up for something that will be important to the post-Blackest Night world of the Teen Titans.

The one thing I really, really disliked about the issue was the set up of conflict between Blue Beetle and Beast Boy. I really like Jaime, and think he and Gar would get along greatly. But as Bill Walko has pointed out, for dramatic purposes it was necessary that someone question the idea of Gar as leader, and by process of elimination the most obvious one was Blue Beetle. Doesn’t mean I like it, though. What’s more, some of Blue Beetle’s objections rang hollow to me - I did not think anything Gar did was somehow detrimental to leading the team (quite the opposite, in fact). Were the situation reversed and it were Traci 13 lying unconscious in serious condition, wouldn’t Jaime be doing much the same thing? That whole sequence just seemed kind of odd. I’m hoping that this is all just set-up for Gar to prove himself to the others that he’s the right man for the job; however, I can also see that this might be the seed from which Blue Beetle’s departure from the team is being laid. I will be very unhappy if the latter is the case.

In speaking of departures, I also get the sense that M’gann is also being set up to leave, which is another departure I don’t want to see. Nevertheless, I noticed that she’s in the preview for Justice League: Cry for Justice #4, so that might be an indication of what’s going to ultimately happen to her. Personally, Bombshell and Aquagirl are the two Teen Titans I have the least interest in, so I’d rather see them go than any of the others. As for those who are still yearning for the return of Conner or Bart, be patient; I think Didio’s most recent answer session made it plain Conner at least would return once he gets booted off Adventure Comics (a move which I agree is rather bone-headed). Bart seems less likely, especially with his own book coming up, but I do think he’ll probably show up from time to time.

Also liked seeing Dr. Mid-Nite as a guest star. I get the impression that Ms. Hendeson is also a JSA fan, since her name is also attached as one of the writers of the JSA 80-Page Giant coming out later this month.

A word on the art: it seemed rushed in places, but was mostly good. I loved Gar’s “Roach with Attitude” pose; Bennett has a good eye for catching the little nuances of character. Nevertheless, he’s done better work, and hope to see more of that in the future.

Don't have much to say about the Ravager co-feature, except that I liked the scene with Ravanger and Miss Martian.

Overall, I’m giving this issue Four stars out of five, although I think my real score is closer to 3.75. A decent, acceptable start to the run, but a lot still depends on what is made of it from here on out.

Chicago Out

Word is that Chicago didn't even make it out of the first round of voting for the Olympic games. That was surprising. Will be interested to hear what the reasons were.

I think that pretty much means Rio is going to get it.

ADDENDUM:
Does this mean that the IOC are a bunch of racists for rejecting Obama and Oprah?

ADDENDUM II:
Yep, Rio gets it.

Gonna go listen to some Mozart now. Not really in the mood to listen to all the talking heads (from both sides of the aisle) discuss why Chicago didn't get the nod.

01 October, 2009

Olympic Dreams

Well, tomorrow is the day when we find out if Chicago will be hosting the 2016 Olympics.

Do I hope Chicago gets it? You betcha. Do I think they will? Sadly, I still think this is Rio's game to lose.

The Visual Artists Guild on 60 Years of Communist Rule in China

The Visual Artists Guild released a statement after their "die-in" protest outside of the People's Republic of China embassy in New York:

Memorial to the victims of 60 years of Peoples Republic of China

On October 1, 1949, Mao Zedong announced the founding of the Peoples Republic of China.

Today, on the eve of the 60th anniversary of the founding of the Peoples Republic of China, we mourn the deaths of 70 million Chinese who died in the greatest genocide of human history.

We mourn those killed during the violent days of land redistribution when people were agitated into murderous frenzies against their fellow human beings labeled as being landowners, rich peasants and bourgeoisie.

We remember those intellectuals who answered the call of the Hundred Flowers Movement to speak freely about their government only to find that they were trapped during the anti-rightist campaign that followed.

We demand the release of all Political Prisoners.

We mourn the 38 million men, women and children who died in the greatest man-made famine in human history as a result of the wanton disregard of human lives under Mao during the Great Leap Forward.

We mourn the millions who died during the Cultural Revolution.

We mourn the millions who were tortured and died in the laogai labor camps.

We mourn the deaths of the Buddhists, Taoists, Tibetans, Catholics, Protestants, Falun Gong practitioners, Uyghur Muslims, and many others who were persecuted and died when they struggled for their right to freedom of religion.

We mourn those who were slaughtered during the Tiananmen Massacre and the subsequent executions which followed.

We grieve with their families.

70 million human beings perished.

Such intentional behavior by the government of the Peoples Republic of China in the treatment of its citizens must not continue in the 21st century.

We demand for the people of the Peoples Republic of China their rights to Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Press, Freedom of Religion and all other Freedoms as stated in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.

We demand the release of all Prisoners of Conscience.

We demand that China's history record an official apology from its government for past transgressions against 70 million human beings and their families.

We look forward to a peaceful and prosperous China whose citizens will live in a nation that respects basic human rights and respects the inherent dignity of human life that all people deserve.

My condolances...

...to the People of China, who today mark 60 years of brutal repression at the hands of the Mao Dynasty.

(Huh. Roman Polanski, Mao Tze Tung... lots of child molesters in the news these days)

So let me instead take this moment to commemorate another "Great Symbol" of modern Chinese history:



P.S. - Free Tibet & Recognize Independence for Taiwan!

There. That should insure I never be allowed an entrance visa into China ever.

PSA: Listen to Overpaid Celebrities

I'm going to be in sooooo much trouble when my in-laws discover this blog...

30 September, 2009

Saavik & The Fifth Element on Roman Polanski: HE'S A RAPIST!!

With Whoopi Goldberg, Woody Allen, Martin Scorsese, Debra Winger, and god knows who else in Hollyweird all coming out in defense of child molester Roman Polanski, its good to see at least some sanity remains in the entertainment world.

Kirsti Alley and Luc Besson are making it plain that they think Polanski still needs to pay for his crime.

28 September, 2009

Reminder: Roman Polanski Raped a Child

Why we should insist that Roman Polanski be extradited back to California to face Justice.

Did Bankers Pay Cause the Financial Crisis?

Not according to finance professor René M. Stulz (Fisher College of Business at Ohio State University), as reported by the New York Times:

Their study has circulated since summer as a working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research. The study found few significant correlations one way or the other, but to the extent it saw patterns, they generally ran counter to what’s often assumed. Instead of performing worse, the banks whose C.E.O.’s had the greatest incentives for excessive risk-taking fared better, on average, than others.

In any case, Professor Stulz says he agrees that it is important for C.E.O. pay incentives to reward long-term performance and to discourage excessive risk-taking. Still, based on his study, he says that “it is not right to blame the credit crisis“ on C.E.O. pay incentives.

The New York Times article can be found here.

27 September, 2009

Joseph Stalin: Pure Evil

One of the major reasons why I am so bitterly opposed to socialism: When you centralize governmental control of everything, you make it far too easy for the monsters to exploit.

Michael Moore's new movie

Kyle Smith at the New York Post sums up my opinion.

ADDENDUM:
The ever-invaluable Cato Institute notes the irony of multi-Billion Dollar corporations bankrolling an anti-Capitalist movie.

Only Six Days to go...

...before Chicago finds out if we're hosting the 2016 Olympic games.  Crossing my fingers we get the nod.  Although truthfully, I've never found the Summer Olympics nearly as interesting as the Winter Olympics (of which, we have only a scant five months before the next iteration thereof).

Personal gut feeling?  I think Chicago is going to lose out to Rio de Janero, but just barely.  Just the feeling I've had for a few weeks.  The US has hosted the Summer games many, many times, whilst South America hasn't hosted a single one (the closest was Mexico City in, I believe, 1964).  Tokyo and Madrid, the other two contenders, have both hosted the games before, so I tend to think they'll get a pass this time.  The Olympic committee has stated in the past that they tend to prefer bringing the games to places they've never been to before.  While Chicago has never hosted the games in the past, the United States has several times.  South America, however, is an entire continent that has never had the games before, so I think that will end up being the deciding factor.

But I could be wrong.  Hope I am.  But I don't expect to be.

Anyway, looking forward to the announcements at the end of the week, but not getting my hopes up too high.

25 September, 2009

So Iran reveals it has a second nuclear facility...

Does this make an Israeli airstrike more or less likely now?

24 September, 2009

Illinois Senate Race 2010

We're at least a good five months away from the Illinois primaries, but at this point I'm pretty sure the race is going to come down to Alexi Giannoulias for the Democrats, and Mark Kirk for the Republicans. According to all the polls I've seen, both gentlemen are substantially ahead among likely voters in their respective parties. However, Mark Kirk is essentially running unopposed, whilst Giannoulias has two semi-major opponents in Chris Kennedy (who is related to the Kennedy family of Massachusetts) and Cheryle Jackson (president of the Chicago Urban League). Whilst I sincerely doubt either challenger will narrow the gap between them and Giannoulias, they might make it enough of a fight he'll have to spend significant capital to secure the nomination. As for the Republicans, I do not think a serious challenger will emerge to topple Kirk from the nomination; the Republicans in Illinois are hungry for a win, and I think most of them realize that Kirk offers them their best chance. Thus, I think they will solidify behind him early.

And if the early Rasmussen polling is any indication, the Republicans have reason to be hopeful in any Kirk vs. Giannoulias matchup. But its still far too early to have any real sense of which way this race is going to go.

Hwæt!

A huge hoard of Anglo-Saxon artifacts has been found.



Now if they could just find a complete version of Widsith, The Fight at Finnsburgh, or the complete works of Cædmon or Cynewulf...

The best thing about writing on a blog no one reads is...

...I can get away with saying whatever the hell I want, with the full knowledge that hardly anyone else shows up here and fewer even care.

Its rather therapeutic.

ACORN: Epic Fail

So, you're a nationwide organization whose primary purpose is to help low income people in matters of housing and "community action". You also dabble a little bit in politics, but that's another story entirely. Anyway, two young filmmakers manage to expose the fact that your organization seems to have a blindspot, in that many of your lowest level employees seem perfectly willing -- even enthusiastically willing -- to aid and abet criminal activity in the name of your organization, even to the extent of offering helpful advise on how to get away with it (I particularly like the guy in San Diego who told the filmmakers the best places for them to smuggle underage prostitutes over the border).

Anyplace else, the reaction would be "Thank you for bringing this to our attention.", while they investigate what went wrong and try to change their corporate culture. But ACORN's reaction?

They sue the filmmakers who exposed them.

Way to go about repairing your image, guys.

ADDENDUM:
An attorney weighs in on the lawsuit here.

ADDENDUM II:
Another attorney chimes in here.